I don't know, I'm thinking it sounds logical to make a new entry. Although that might create some confusion since both have the same title. Perhaps adding a parenthetical indicator like "(original)" or the release date to the first one's title would help keep it clear. Or we could just ignore that and put something in the notes, the same way we handle reprints of CDs. If we archive the release price why not archive the original track listing as well? We make new entries for the reprints of albums that add a bonus track and that's basically the same situation we're talking about here, the only difference is one type is physical and the other is digital, which I don't think is enough of a distinction to justify separate standards. Digital releases aren't less worthy of archiving historical versions.
|