Thread: ariola (#691)
View Single Post
  #24  
Old Mar 2, 2018, 01:43 AM
nstz nstz is offline
VGMdb Staff
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 399
Default

I see your point regarding ariola, onenation etc but I'm not sure if I want to restructure all SML releases considering there seems to be little consesus on what is actually linked as a publisher (just see the current thread). If we can reach a consensus I'm willing to change them (although I'll probably regret it the moment I start considering how many releases there are..)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Phonograph View Post
sony music records inc was a record company that became sony music labels inc
smr was the copyrights holder as the time of smr inc, and is still after smr inc became sml inc
but smr isn't a label, maybe I'd have had to specify, I used smr as publisher for convenience (but normally it's smr inc that should be showed, not smr)
Fair enough, I moved those releases back to Sony Music Labels Inc.
Reply With Quote