Thread: ariola (#691)
View Single Post
  #13  
Old Sep 17, 2016, 02:33 AM
Phonograph's Avatar
Phonograph Phonograph is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 4,351
Default

I said very long ago that the actual "publisher" system was misconceived (maybe due to vbulletin restriction in the way to make stuff, I don't know)

firstly, why submission and edit page must have "Imprint / Publisher (Distributor)" in the same field?
catalog has 1 field, Price has 1 field etc
but album title and publisher fields have 1 field for several info

there should be 1 field for label or manufacturer + 1 field for distributor (therefore 2 distinct fields)
then about imprint/publisher, my opinion is as follows

* label should be always used without its parent record company aka manufacturer (and falsely named publisher)
because the label already belongs to its parent record company, it's pointless and could be redundant
nonsense -> King Records / King Record Co Ltd (Distributed by King Record Co Ltd)
sense -----> King Records (Distributed by King Record Co Ltd)

* manufacturer should be used when the label isn't directly implied in the producing process (enclosures for example)
Reply With Quote